MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083377062 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2012.6334942

Strategic iniitialization of a hybrid particle swarm optimization-simullated annealing algorithm (HPSOSA) for PID controller design for a nonlinear system

2012· article· en· W2083377062 on OpenAlexaff
Mathiruban Tharmalingam, K. Raahemifar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSimulated annealingParticle swarm optimizationPID controllerInitializationBenchmark (surveying)Hybrid algorithm (constraint satisfaction)Nonlinear systemAlgorithmComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Adaptive simulated annealingMathematical optimizationMathematicsControl engineeringEngineeringTemperature controlControl (management)Artificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There exist some variations of the particle swarm optimization - simulated annealing optimization technique (PSOSA) hybrid algorithm for solving the PID control design problem, however most of these algorithms use the simulated annealing as a tool to escape local minimums that the PSO algorithm may get trapped in and also these algorithms initialize the particles within the solution space randomly. In this paper, the effects of initializing the particles strategically within the solution space along with the application of the SA algorithm to the hybrid algorithm at each iteration are explored. To test the effectiveness of the proposed modifications the algorithms are compared on common benchmark functions before the modified hybrid algorithm (MPSOSA) is used to design a PID controller for the inverted Pendulum problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms ResearchFrench-language works237,207