MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083377062 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2012.6334942

Strategic iniitialization of a hybrid particle swarm optimization-simullated annealing algorithm (HPSOSA) for PID controller design for a nonlinear system

2012· article· en· W2083377062 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSimulated annealingParticle swarm optimizationPID controllerInitializationBenchmark (surveying)Hybrid algorithm (constraint satisfaction)Nonlinear systemAlgorithmComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Adaptive simulated annealingMathematical optimizationMathematicsControl engineeringEngineeringTemperature controlControl (management)Artificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There exist some variations of the particle swarm optimization - simulated annealing optimization technique (PSOSA) hybrid algorithm for solving the PID control design problem, however most of these algorithms use the simulated annealing as a tool to escape local minimums that the PSO algorithm may get trapped in and also these algorithms initialize the particles within the solution space randomly. In this paper, the effects of initializing the particles strategically within the solution space along with the application of the SA algorithm to the hybrid algorithm at each iteration are explored. To test the effectiveness of the proposed modifications the algorithms are compared on common benchmark functions before the modified hybrid algorithm (MPSOSA) is used to design a PID controller for the inverted Pendulum problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.827

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it