Artefacts in the mechanical characterization of porcine articular cartilage due to freezing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many experimental protocols for investigating articular cartilage mechanics have involved the use of a freeze-thaw cycle for storage or tissue manipulation. It was hypothesized that mechanical properties are altered due to freeze-thaw cycling. The aim of this study, therefore, was to examine the possibility of protocol-induced artefacts in the mechanical properties of porcine articular cartilage specimens related specifically to freeze-thaw events. Twenty-eight osteochondral specimens [14 from the femoral condyles (FCs) and 14 from the patella-femoral (PF) groove] were tested in confined compression before and after being frozen at -20 degrees C for 7 days. The fluid-independent and fluid-dependent mechanical properties (aggregate modulus of the solid phase and the half-life of stress relaxation respectively) were determined and compared. The aggregate modulus decreased by 13.5 per cent and 20.1 per cent for the PF and FC regions respectively (p = 0.002) and the half-life of the stress relaxation at 10 per cent strain decreased by 6.4 per cent and 12.6 per cent for the PF and FC specimens respectively (p = 0.0341). In conclusion, it has been shown that the protocol used, which involved freezing to -20 degrees C and thawing after 7 days, caused artefacts in the mechanical properties of porcine osteochondral specimens. It is suggested that protocols requiring freezing must be critically reviewed to eliminate such artefacts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".