Cognitive-Impairment-Free Life Expectancy for Canadian Seniors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: While cognitive impairment (CI) and dementia are among the most common morbid conditions in later life, life expectancies free from CI or dementia have been the object of much less investigation than life expectancy based on measures of physical functioning. METHODS: We estimated sex-specific CI-free life expectancy in Canada for people aged 65 and older using data from a nationwide, multicenter Canadian study on the epidemiology of dementia. RESULTS: The absolute number of years with CI remains virtually constant with increasing age. Whatever the current age, senior men can expect to live 2.5-3 years of their remaining life with some form of CI and about 1.5 years of those with dementia. For women, these figures rise to 3-4 years with CI, of which 2-2.5 years are spent with dementia. CONCLUSION: Surviving to an older age does not result in a longer average absolute period of CI. This period is associated with a significant reduction in quality of life, the use of home and institutional services, as well as psychological and physical distress for formal and informal caregivers. Results are compared to findings reported in other countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".