MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083406888 · doi:10.1021/jp013865n

Possible Reaction Pathway of HN<sub>3</sub> + N<sub>5</sub><sup>+</sup> and Stability of the Products' Isomers

2002· article· en· W2083406888 on OpenAlexaff
Li Jie Wang, Qian Shu Li, Peter L. Warburton, Paul G. Mezey

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsomerizationChemistryDensity functional theoryDissociation (chemistry)Potential energy surfaceDecompositionTransition stateComputational chemistryReaction rate constantPhysical chemistryTransition state theoryKineticsMoleculePhysicsOrganic chemistryCatalysisQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The potential energy surfaces of N 8 H + involving the synthesis pathway of N 5 + + HN 3 → N 8 H +, the isomerization of ortho-N 8 H + → int-N 8 H +, and the decomposition reaction of int-N 8 H + → N 2 H + + 3N 2 were investigated. The structures were optimized by hybrid density functional theory. Relative energies were also calculated using second-order configuration interaction with single and double excitations. The barrier heights of the synthesis pathway in the forward and reverse directions were predicted to be 32.4 and 26.4 kcal/mol, and those of the isomerization and decomposition reactions were 64.9 and 65.3 kcal/mol at the QCISD/6-311++G** level, respectively. A calculation of rate constants for the synthesis and dissociation pathways of N 8 H + ( C S ) was done by the variational transition state theory. The electron densities of species involved in the potential energy surface were calculated and analyzed. The results will provide data for the design of high-energy density materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.677

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207