Self-management techniques for bipolar disorder in a sample of New Zealand Chinese
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aims The aim of the study presented in this article was to consider how New Zealand Chinese with bipolar disorder manage their condition, regain and maintain wellness through the use of self-management techniques. Methods Nine New Zealand Chinese with bipolar disorder type I or II who had reasonable performance in role functioning were interviewed. Data analysis was guided by the inductive approach. Findings In contrast to Western psychosocial interventions, which emphasize the individual's independence, self-advocacy and self-identity, New Zealand Chinese are more likely to value themselves through relationships with others. Most participants emphasized the importance of harmony with self and others, and adopted passive and nature-oriented attitudes encouraged by Taoism to deal with life stress. Strategies of ‘taking it easy’ and ‘looking at problems in others’ shoes' were frequently used when dealing with interpersonal conflicts. Conclusions The concepts of health and life as part of traditional Chinese culture were found to be the fundamental elements influencing the participants' coping patterns. There is a strong need for facilitating the connection between health professionals and clients. This study indicates that to do this, health professionals must be aware of the importance of cultural sensitivity when delivering health care in a multicultural environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".