MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083439335 · doi:10.5206/wurjhns.2013-14.7

Western Faculty Profile: Dr. Mark Workentin

2013· article· en· W2083439335 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Kevin Lam

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern Undergraduate Research Journal Health and Natural Sciences · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicVarious Chemistry Research Topics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassionAlma materUndergraduate researchLibrary scienceResearch councilMedical educationManagementEngineeringEngineering physicsSociologyPsychologyMedicinePhilosophyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dr. Mark Workentin is a Professor in the Department of Chemistry at Western University. After receiving his PhD at McMaster University and working as a Research Associate at the National Research Council (NRC) in Ottawa, Professor Workentin returned to his undergraduate alma mater to become a faculty member. His research group primarily focuses on studying the physical organic chemistry of materials. Not only has Dr. Workentin produced amazing research, but he has also been awarded for his ability and passion to teach students chemistry. Kevin Lam, a first year representative for WURJHNS, had the opportunity to interview Dr. Workentin to learn more about his research and his experiences at Western.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern Undergraduate Research Journal Health and Natural SciencesSame topicVarious Chemistry Research TopicsFrench-language works237,207