MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083464616 · doi:10.5380/ret.v5i3.27131

A crise e a gripe suína

2009· article· pt· W2083464616 on OpenAlexaff
Luciano Nakabashi

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Economia & Tecnologia · 2009
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovation and Socioeconomic Development
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Assim como a gripe suína, a crise causou um certo pânico inicial, mas foi bem mais amena no Brasil em relação aos países do norte, e está se dissipando rapidamente com o início da primavera. A expectativa é que a economia brasileira já apresente uma boa recuperação a partir de 2010. Já no caso da gripe, a incerteza para o próximo ano é maior e depende, entre outras coisas, dos avanços da ciência. No entanto, apesar da recuperação, cabe aos gestores de política econômica uma atenção maior em relação à evolução da estrutura da pauta de exportações.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.015
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Economia & TecnologiaSame topicInnovation and Socioeconomic DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207