MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083497222 · doi:10.1093/ps/86.5.1006

The Response of the Heart and Pulmonary Arteries to Hypoxia, Pressure, and Volume. A Short Review

2007· review· en· W2083497222 on OpenAlexaff
R. J. Julian

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiologyMuscle hypertrophyInternal medicineMyocyteMedicineHypoxia (environmental)Contraction (grammar)Vascular resistanceBlood pressureAnatomyChemistryOxygen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pulmonary arterioles react to hypoxia by contraction and to increased pressure and volume by hypertrophy of the muscular wall, referred to as pulmonary vascular remodeling, both of which increase vascular resistance and result in increased pulmonary arterial pressure. Heart muscle reacts to increased pressure by hypertrophy of cardiac myocytes and thickening of the muscular wall. The heart responds to increased volume by dilation of the chamber that may result in physiologic or pathologic hypertrophy of the muscle wall. Heart muscle cells are very sensitive to hypoxia or other insults, and this may result in death of individual cardiac myocytes with lengthening and thinning of the remaining heart muscle cells and dilation of the chamber in a process called dilated cardiomyopathy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoultry ScienceSame topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207