MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083504116 · doi:10.1093/fs/knl176

Les Échanges entre les universités européennes à la Renaissance Les Échanges entre les universités européennes à la Renaissance. Actes réunis et édités par M <scp>ichel</scp> B <scp>ideaux</scp> et M <scp>arie</scp> -M <scp>adeleine</scp> F <scp>ragonard</scp> . (Travaux d'Humanisme et Renaissance, 384). Geneva, Droz, 2003. 408 pp. Pb 120 SwF.

2007· article· fr· W2083504116 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanFifteenthScotsHumanitiesDocumentationClassicsHistorySociologyArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This volume of twenty-four essays considers the international character of European universities from the late fifteenth to the early seventeenth centuries. Its title is slightly misleading. The focus here is not so much upon the exchange between universities as it is upon the social and cultural impact of a highly mobile early modern student body and professoriate. Thus, Nicole Bingen follows French students in Italy; Pierre Civil considers the fate of Spanish students and Charles Béné that of Croatian students abroad; Patrick Ferté examines the role of Toulouse at the crossroads of Spain and Italy while Marie-Claude Tucker looks at Scots studying law there; Rainer C. Schwinges studies recruitment patterns at German universities. Several essays raise important issues. James K. Farge, who has amassed more than 40,000 records for students at the University of Paris in the early sixteenth century, discusses the range of institutional sources available and demonstrates the need to use these critically and comparatively. Hilde de Ridder-Symoens, studying Douai, shows how creative use of alternative sources can compensate for a lack of institutional documentation. Ian Maclean, similarly drawing on evidence which allows for sharp qualitative distinctions, reveals how students travelling to study medicine at Padua, Basle and Montpellier would have been offered strikingly different forms of medical instruction, and Richard Cooper shows how the student body at Turin, as at other universities studied in this volume, became less international in the second half of the sixteenth century, when the university came more and more to function as a training ground for a local administrative and clerical corps. Two essays in particular stand out from the pack. Jean-Marie Le Gall studies the fortunes of the religious orders in the universities. Though the orders were among the first to found colleges in the thirteenth century, the interests of the orders and the universities diverged considerably in later centuries. While learning could play an important role within monastic reform movements, colleges did not constitute important instruments of spiritual and institutional renewal within the orders (the Jesuits excepted) until the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Le Gall argues convincingly that the seeming disinterest of the orders in the universities was calculated: the universities could contribute little to the reaffirmation of ideals of communal living and the sacerdotal nature of monastic life. Lucia Felici investigates the Erasmusstiftung at Basle — Erasmus's bequest created more than 12,000 subsidies and bursaries for students to attend the University of Basle in the sixteenth century. Until Calvinism was established in 1570, these were largely offered without geographical or confessional prejudice. Felici paints a vivid portrait of the dynamic relationship which existed between a large cosmopolitan body of students and professors, the rather small university and the international Basle presses. Many of these essays are based on extensive research, some of which is presented here for the first time. While as is to be expected, contributions are of varying quality, the volume as a whole deserves to be consulted by all students of the early modern university.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.008
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it