Physicochemical Determinants for Drug Induced Blockade of HERG Potassium Channels: Effect of Charge and Charge Shielding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The data on the activities of all previously described HERG blockers and of the most widely cited I(Kr) blockers were analyzed with respect to the effect of potential charged center(s) and its shielding by surrounding structural elements. The following model was considered: the less shielding of the charged form of the drug occurs, the easier its deprotonation will be and the less potency of the blockade of HERG/I(Kr) channels will be. Tertiary amines which form ammonium ions shielded by two structural fragments of the drug molecule were found to be potent HERG/I(Kr) blockers with IC50 < 1 microM (16 of 19 compounds, 84%). However, if the charged center was found at the molecular periphery as such groups as dimethylamino, N-methylpiperidino, N-methylpiperazino, N-methylpyrrolidino, pyrrolidino, imidazolo and partial periphery (diethylamino), then only moderate potency for HERG blockade with 1 microM < IC50 < 10 microM (8 of 11 compounds; 73%) was observed. Similarly, 27 of 32 weak HERG blockers ( IC50 > 10 microM) were found to be primary or secondary amines, or neutral or very weakly basic compounds. Ions of primary and secondary amines are susceptible to the fast deprotonation of the charged center and they, as well as non-charged compounds, have a low probability of induction of Torsades de Pointes (TdP). Conformational analysis and modeling of the interaction of the charged fragment of the drugs with acetone, a system that mimics a ketone fragment of HERG/I(Kr) channel, supports preference of the conformation with the shielded charged center for potent HERG/I(Kr) blockers. The absence of stereospecificity of HERG/I(Kr) blockade observed in most of the published studies reinforces the importance of charged center shielding as a key parameter. We suggest that the introduction of a hydroxy group at position 3 relative to a tertiary ammonium charged center, or the introduction of hydroxy, alkoxy or amino groups at position 2 relative to the nitrogen center of an aromatic system, should provide easy access of a water molecule to the proton, thereby facilitating deprotonation and thus leading to a moderate or weak HERG/I(Kr) blockade and a reduced risk of TdP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".