MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083513880 · doi:10.1109/eml.2012.6325088

Modeling, simulation and experiment of switched reluctance linear launcher

2012· article· en· W2083513880 on OpenAlexaff
Hao Chen, Q. Wang, Jason Gu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSwitched reluctance motorControl theory (sociology)WaveformReluctance motorNonlinear systemController (irrigation)MATLABThree-phaseMagnetic reluctancePower (physics)EngineeringComputer sciencePhysicsRotor (electric)Electrical engineeringVoltageMagnet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a nonlinear simulation models of switched reluctance linear launcher drive based on MATLAB Platform. The proposed model consists of a three-phase 6/4 structure simple side switched reluctance linear motor, a three-phase asymmetric bridge power converter and a closed-loop velocity controller. It is integrated with the magnetization curves of Switched Reluctance linear motor obtained by the two dimensions finite element electromagnetic field calculation, the nonlinear electrical network model of the power converter and the excitation/commutation/velocity control algorithms. There are mover relative position calculation module , controller module, power converter module, phase winding modules, and velocity calculation module. The simulated phase current waveforms and velocity curves agree well with the tested phase current waveforms and velocity curves experimentally. It is shown that the proposed nonlinear simulation models of the three-phase 6/4 structure Switched Reluctance linear launcher system is valid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Launch and Propulsion TechnologyFrench-language works237,207