MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083530633 · doi:10.1021/jm901796s

A Repurposing Strategy Identifies Novel Synergistic Inhibitors of <i>Plasmodium falciparum</i> Heat Shock Protein 90

2010· article· en· W2083530633 on OpenAlexaff
Dea Shahinas, Michael N. Liang, Alessandro Datti, Dylan R. Pillai

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medicinal Chemistry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHeat shock proteins research
Canadian institutionsToronto Public HealthUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasmodium falciparumChemistryDrug repositioningChloroquineApproved drugDrugHsp90PharmacologyAntimalarial AgentIC50Heat shock proteinDrug discoveryChemical libraryMalariaSmall moleculeBiochemistryIn vitroBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Malaria is responsible for 3 million deaths annually. Antimalarial drug resistance is widespread, and few novel, well-defined targets exist. A robotic high throughput screen (HTS) was performed using 4000 small molecules from a natural compound (Spectrum), pharmacologically active (Lopac), and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drug library (Prestwick) for competitive inhibition of the ATP-binding (GHKL) domain of Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) Hsp90, a highly conserved chaperone. Hits were further screened for specificity based on differential inhibition of PfHsp90 in comparison to human (Hs) Hsp90. PfHsp90-specific inhibitors showed 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC(50)) in the nanomolar range when tested using a cell-based antimalarial validation assay. Three hits, identified as selective PfHsp90 inhibitors in the HTS, also demonstrated synergistic activity in the presence of the known antimalarial drug chloroquine. These data support PfHsp90 as a specific antimalarial target with potential for synergy with known antimalarials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations90
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medicinal ChemistrySame topicHeat shock proteins researchFrench-language works237,207