MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083533848 · doi:10.3917/dha.hs80.0339

A case study in Isocrates: the expulsion of the Peisistratids

2013· article· fr· W2083533848 on OpenAlex
Frances Pownall

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDialogues d histoire ancienne · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En dépit des protestations d’Hérodote et de Thucydide, la tradition populaire à Athènes considérait que la cité avait été libérée de la tyrannie des Pisistratides par Harmodios et Aristogiton. Rien d’étonnant, donc, à ce que les orateurs attiques aient adopté la version populaire des événements. Isocrate attribue cependant la libération d’Athènes à Clisthène et non pas aux tyrannicides, qui brillent d’ailleurs par leur absence dans son œuvre. Le point de vue que je défends dans cet article est que l’auditoire visé par Isocrate appartenait à l’élite et non au demos , ce qui lui laissait la liberté de réinventer la version « officielle » et démocratique des faits. L’utilisation des exemples tirés de l’Histoire chez Isocrate devrait donc être traitée séparément de celle qui en est faite chez les orateurs attiques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it