MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083565852 · doi:10.1109/pes.2008.4596727

Design and implementation of a pragmatic open architecture for control center modernization and consolidation project at BCTC

2008· article· en· W2083565852 on OpenAlexaff
V. Vankayala, E. Vaahedi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsTransCanada (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectureModular designConsolidation (business)Data centerComputer scienceScalabilitySystems engineeringEngineeringEngineering managementBusinessOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This presentation provides an overview of the open architecture for the control center modernization and consolidation project at BCTC. BCTC is the provincial crown corporation responsible for operating, planning and managing British Columbia's high-voltage electric transmission grid. BCTC is regulated by the British Columbia Utilities Commission (BCUC). The design is based on the technology strategy of creating a long-term cost effective, sound and sustainable solution. The integration solution provided allows modular introduction of new applications and upgrading of individual applications without impacting the rest of the system. The approach consisted of pragmatic, real-world decision making framework that addressed multiple conflicting requirements and constraints. The architecture created an open and flexible framework for evolving the consolidated control centers into a scalable infrastructure for evolution and implementation of a long term road map.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Systems and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207