MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083582003 · doi:10.3934/dcds.2014.34.915

On Volterra integral operators with highly oscillatory kernels

2013· article· en· W2083582003 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hermann Brunner

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicDifferential Equations and Boundary Problems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Mathematical SciencesHong Kong Baptist UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaIsaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences
KeywordsVolterra integral equationUncountable setIntegral equationOscillation (cell signaling)MathematicsVolterra equationsFourier integral operatorSingular integralDaniell integralFocus (optics)Mathematical analysisPure mathematicsNonlinear systemPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the high-oscillation properties of solutions to integral equationsassociated with two classes of Volterra integral operators: compact operatorswith highly oscillatory kernels that are either smooth or weakly singular, andnoncompact cordial Volterra integral operators with highly oscillatory kernels.In the latter case the focus is on the dependence of the (uncountable) spectrumon the oscillation parameter. It is shown that the results derivedin this paper merely open a window to a general theory of solutions of highlyoscillatory Volterra integral equations, and many questions remain to beanswered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical SystemsSame topicDifferential Equations and Boundary ProblemsFrench-language works237,207