MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083585397 · doi:10.1021/jo020184v

Naphthalene Diols:  A New Class of Antioxidants Intramolecular Hydrogen Bonding in Catechols, Naphthalene Diols, and Their Aryloxyl Radicals

2002· article· en· W2083585397 on OpenAlexaff
Mario C. Foti, Erin R. Johnson, Melinda R. Vinqvist, James S. Wright, L. R. C. Barclay, K. U. Ingold

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicFree Radicals and Antioxidants
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityMount Allison University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryIntramolecular forceRadicalBond-dissociation energyHydrogen atomMedicinal chemistryReaction rate constantHydrogen bondNaphthaleneAutoxidationReactivity (psychology)PhotochemistryPhenolsStereochemistryDissociation (chemistry)Organic chemistryMoleculeKineticsAlkyl

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1,8-Naphthalenediol, 5, and its 4-methoxy derivative, 6, were found to be potent H-atom transfer (HAT) compounds on the basis of their rate constants for H-atom transfer to the 2,2-di(4-t-octylphenyl)-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DOPPH*), k(ArOH/DOPPH)*, or as antioxidants during inhibited styrene autoxidation, k(ArOH/ROO)*, initiated with AIBN. The rate constants showed that 5 and 6 are more active HAT compounds than the ortho-diols, catechol, 1, 2,3-naphthalenediol, 2, and 3,5-di-tert-butylcatechol, 3. Compound 6 has almost twice the antioxidant activity, k(ArOH/ROO)* = 6.0 x 10(6) M(-)(1) s(-1), of that of the vitamin E model compound, 2,2,5,7,8-pentamethyl-6-chromanol, 4. Calculations of the O-H bond dissociation enthalpies compared to those of phenols, (deltaBDEs), of 1-6 predict a HAT order of reactivity of 2 < 1 < 3 approximately 4 < 5 < 6 in general agreement with kinetic results. Calculations on the diols show that intramolecular H-bonding stabilizes the radicals formed on H-atom transfer more than it does the parent diols, and this effect contributes to the increased HAT activity of 5 and 6 compared to the activities of the catechols. For example, the increased stabilization due to the intramolecular H-bond of 5 radical over 5 parent of 8.6 kcal/mol was about double that of 2 radical over 2 parent of 4.6 kcal/mol. Linear free energy plots of log k(ArOH/DOPPH)* and log k(ArOH/ROO)* versus deltaBDEs for compounds 1-6 along with available literature values for nonsterically hindered monophenols placed the compounds on common scales. The derived Evans-Polanyi constants from the plots for the two reactions, alpha(DOPPH)* = 0.48 > alpha(ROO)* = 0.32, gave the expected order, since the ROO* reaction is more exothermic than the DOPPH* reaction. Compound 6 is sufficiently reactive to react directly with oxygen, and it lies off the log k(ArOH/ROO)* versus deltaBDE plot.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations161
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicFree Radicals and AntioxidantsFrench-language works237,207