Bibliographic record
Abstract
ChantalPontbriand's role cannot be over-emphasized as far as the quality of Parachute, created by her in 1975 in Montreal 1 , is concerned.Her foreword, introducing the 23 articles brought together for these two publications, updates the principles behind the magazine's success.In them, under the aegis of Jacques Derrida, C. Pontbriand champions an ethics of "hospitality" attesting to her own ability to lend an ear to the other, and her attentiveness to the "emergent zones" of artistic and intellectual output, not forgetting her ability to stand back from her own activity.It is this latter quality that made the magazine's new and successful departure possible, after 25 years, in 2000, coinciding with the selection of these essays.The chronological part, consisting of nine articles in the first book (1975)(1976)(1977)(1978)(1979)(1980)(1981)(1982)(1983)(1984) and fourteen in the second (1985)(1986)(1987)(1988)(1989)(1990)(1991)(1992)(1993)(1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000) shows a clear intention of historical readability.The two volumes thus make available much valuable information about many international artists busy over those years, about whom there is little to be found in France:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".