MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083680656 · doi:10.1080/07055900.2012.733307

Iceberg Detection Using Compact Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar

2012· article· en· W2083680656 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueATMOSPHERE-OCEAN · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space AgencyDefence Research and Development Canada
KeywordsPolarimetrySynthetic aperture radarRemote sensingComputer sciencePhysicsGeographyOpticsScattering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, the use of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) for iceberg detection has been increasing thanks to the greater availability and coverage of SAR data, particularly polarimetric data. Greater amounts of polarimetric information can increase detection performance, preventing false alarms and missed detections. However, quad-polarization (quad-pol) SAR systems have increased data rate and power usage requirements, causing quad-pol modes to have generally half the swath width of dual-polarization (dual-pol) modes. Compact polarimetry is a compromise that allows the approximation of quad-pol information (referred to as “pseudo quad-pol”) using a dual-pol SAR. In this paper, using compact polarimetric data simulated from RADARSAT-2 quad-pol imagery, we show how pseudo-quad-pol data can be used for iceberg detection using the likelihood ratio test method. We show that use of the pseudo-quad-pol HV intensity can augment the detection performance of a compact polarimetric SAR system. We also compare the performance of the various compact polarimetric configurations to linearly polarized dual-pol and quad-pol data. [Traduit par la rédaction] Ces dernières années, le radar à synthèse d'ouverture (RSO) a été de plus en plus utilisé pour la détection des icebergs grâce à une meilleure disponibilité et une meilleure couverture des données RSO, en particulier des données polarimétriques. De plus grandes quantités d'informations polarimétiques peuvent améliorer la performance de détection, ce qui évite les fausses alarmes et les détections manquées. Cependant, les systèmes RSO à quadruple polarisation (quad-pol) exigent des débits binaires et une consommation d’énergie plus élevés, de telle sorte que les modes quad-pol utilisent généralement une largeur de couloir la moitié moindre que celle des modes à double polarisation (dual-pol). La polarimétrie compacte est un compromis qui permet d'approximer l'information quad-pol (alors appelée « pseudo-quad-pol ») au moyen d'un RSO dual-pol. Dans cet article, en utilisant des données de polarimétrie compacte simulées à partir de l'imagerie RADARSAT-2 quad-pol, nous montrons comment les données pseudo-quad-pol peuvent servir à la détection des icebergs au moyen de la méthode du test du rapport des vraisemblances. Nous montrons que l'utilisation de l'intensité HV pseudo-quad-pol peut augmenter la performance de détection d'un système RSO polarimétrique compact. Nous comparons aussi la performance des diverses configurations polarimétriques compactes aux données dual-pol et quad-pol linéairement polarisées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it