MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083707997 · doi:10.1088/0965-0393/20/6/065008

Friction pressure method for simulating solute drag and particle pinning in a multiphase-field model

2012· article· en· W2083707997 on OpenAlexaff
Sina Shahandeh, Michael Greenwood, Matthias Militzer

Bibliographic record

VenueModelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersPohang University of Science and Technology
KeywordsMaterials scienceDragParticle (ecology)MechanicsField (mathematics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In many polycrystalline materials, second phase particles and solute atoms impose a drag pressure on the motion of grain boundaries.The drag effect occurs on a scale comparable to the particle diameter and interface thickness.However, to simulate grain growth with numerical efficiency one requires a model that captures the drag pressure on the interfaces but does not resolve the fine particles or solute segregation spike.In this paper, a multiphasefield model is proposed to simulate the evolution of microstructure under constant and velocity dependent drag pressures.The accuracy of the model is confirmed in comparison with analytical expressions for a shrinking circular grain.Application of the model is presented for grain growth in two dimensions under particle pinning.Measuring curvature of grain-boundary segments reveals that in the completely pinned structure, the average driving pressure is not equal to but lower than the pinning pressure.Considering this effect, the predicted limiting grain size is about three times larger than that assumed in conventional mean-field theories.Based on this observation, a correction factor is introduced for these mean-field models.The proposed phase-field formulation is also applied to simulate grain growth in the presence of solute drag.The grain growth kinetics follows a phenomenological relationship that can be described with a power law with a time exponent in the range 0.35-0.50.The deviation of the time exponent from 0.5, associated with ideal grain growth, and its correlation with the solute drag parameters is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModelling and Simulation in Materials Science and EngineeringSame topicRheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207