MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083720905 · doi:10.2323/jgam.46.217

Screening of microbes, isolation, genetic manipulation, and physiological optimization of Brevibacterium helvolum to produce and excrete thymidine and deoxyuridine in high concentrations.

2000· article· en· W2083720905 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Satwinder K. Kalirai, B. Scanlon, Steve C. Taylor, Shamim Ahmad

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of General and Applied Microbiology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTrent UniversityNottingham Trent University
KeywordsThymidineBiologyDeoxyuridineBacteriaStrain (injury)MicrobiologyBrevibacteriumIsolation (microbiology)MutantBiochemistryDNAMicroorganismGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Analogues of deoxypyrimidines are used in the treatment of a variety of human ailments. Azidothymidine, or AZT, is one such analogue used to treat AIDS. Thymidine is the precursor of AZT, and its cost contributes to the high price of AZT. Attempts are being made to isolate and genetically manipulate microbes that can produce and excrete this compound in high concentrations. To this end, 145 different microbial species from Zeneca and the American Type Culture Collection were screened. Moreover, soil samples were collected from 36 different sites in England, and microbes from these samples were isolated and screened. >From approximately 25,000 isolates screened as single colonies and from 4,000 in liquid cultures, a strain of Brevibacterium helvolum showed the most promising results. Pyrimidine metabolic pathways of this bacterium were worked out, the isolate was genetically manipulated, and physiological conditions were optimized to increase the production of thymidine and deoxyuridine. These mutants of B. helvolum are considered to be of commercial importance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of General and Applied MicrobiologySame topicBacteriophages and microbial interactionsFrench-language works237,207