MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083731469 · doi:10.1353/hsp.2008.0099

Pentecost for the Southland

2008· article· en· W2083731469 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Randall J. Stephens

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorically speaking · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPentecostalism and Christianity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtestantismScrutinyChristianityReligious studiesHistoryQuarter (Canadian coin)TheologyPhilosophyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

January/February 2008 · Historically Speaking 27 Pentecost for the Southland* RandallJ. Stephens The story of holiness and Pentecostalism in the U.S. South from the last quarter of the 19th century to the early 20th century remains largely untold , as does that of the greater significance of these movements in both the modern South and the nation as a whole. Yet they are hardly peripheral to modern American, and particularly southern, history. With millions of devotees in the South alone, holiness and Pentecostalism now rank second only to Roman Catholicism among the world's Christian denominations. The U.S. South is home to the headquarters of fiftyseven different Pentecostal churches and sects—including those of the Assemblies of God, the Church of God in Christ, and the Church of God (Cleveland, Tennessee). Such denominations, and born-again Christianity in general, have experienced phenomenal growth since the 1970s. Their numbers soared as liberal Protestantism in the South and elsewhere waned. Moreover, the recent politicization of conservative evangelicals, of whom southern Pentecostals make up a significant proportion, deserves special scrutiny. Believers are now more visible than ever before . Devout southern Pentecostals and those with connections to the tradition—including former attorney general John Ashcroft, conservative religious spokesmen Jim Bakker and John Hagee, country singers Tammy Wynette and Johnny Cash, and rock and roll innovators Jerry Lee Lewis, Little Richard, and Elvis Presley—are known throughout the world.1 Pentecostalism first took root in the South among anonymous zealots on the cultural fringes of society. The religious innovations and unusual beliefs of first-generation adherents were deeply offensive to genteel upper and middle-class Southerners . The unconventional attitude toward religious authority among those in the holiness and Pentecostal movements, as well as dieir views on race and gender during the height of the Jim Crow era, set them on an uncharted and dangerous course in Christian social life. These religious traditions first entered the South through die northern revival of perfectionism in the late 19th century and then through an exuberant 1906 revival in Los Angeles. Southerners who adopted die theology and religious practices of * Adapted and reprinted by permission of the publisher from The Fire Spreads: Holiness andPetecostalism in theAmerican South by Randall J. Stephens, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, Copyright © 2008 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved . Holiness preachers Trena Platt, Rev. Mary Lee Cagle, and an unidentified woman in a revival tent, late 1 9th century. Courtesy of the Church of the Nazarene Archives, Kansas City, Missouri. those outside the region suffered the scorn of mainline southern Protestants. Hence believers played profoundly countercultural roles in the South in this early period. Adherents espoused a host of unusual beliefs regarding the end of die world, gifts of the Holy Ghost, and ecstatic worship. By 1906 devotees in the South had come to embrace the theology of premillennialism, a doctrine that stressed the imminent return of Jesus Christ, who would rescue the faithful from a corrupt, irredeemable world. Highly popular among contemporary American evangelicals, it was a belief almost unheard of in the turn-of-the-century South. The faithful looked to the heavens for their salvation and exalted sinless perfection. They also expected to receive the same "gifts of the Spirit"—healing, prophecy, miraculous "tongues speech"—evident in the Book of Acts, available again in the last days. Outside observers often dismissed holiness disciples and Pentecostals as a dispossessed minority, uneducated and fanatical. The later growth and prominence of holiness and Pentecostalism is all the more surprising, given the obstacles they once faced.2 Because holiness people were less bound by prevailing social codes than members of mainline churches, their meetings were frequently racially integrated, wild, and loud. At the same time, women assumed leadership roles often denied to them in other churches. This openness proved to be one of the most distinguishing marks of both the holiness movement and, later, Pentecostalism in the South. One female initiate from North Carolina expressed the sentiments of many when she denounced evangelicals who preached patriarchy. "Oh, how wily the enemy of our soul is," she declared. 3 By the end of the century, holiness dissenters had grown increasingly...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score0.934

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3450.059

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.140 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistorically speakingSame topicPentecostalism and Christianity StudiesFrench-language works237,207