MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Does Concomitant Administration of Sevelamer and Calcium Carbonate Modify the Control of Phosphatemia?

2009· article· en· W2083738012 on OpenAlexaff
Georges Ouellet, Héloïse Cardinal, M. Mailhot, Louis‐Georges Ste‐Marie, Louise Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueTherapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital Saint-Luc
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSevelamerMedicineConcomitantPhosphate binderPhosphateCalciumInternal medicineCrossover studyBicarbonateHemodialysisEndocrinologyCalcium carbonateGastroenterologyHyperphosphatemiaChemistryBiochemistryPlacebo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is no guideline regarding the concomitant or distant administration of sevelamer and calcium carbonate. Our aim was to determine whether serum phosphate varied when sevelamer and calcium carbonate were administered concomitantly in comparison to administration at separate meals. Fourteen chronic hemodialysis patients were enrolled in this cross-over, randomized trial. Each subject underwent two four-week study periods. During the "concomitant" period, subjects were instructed to take both sevelamer and calcium carbonate together at each meal, whereas in the "separate" period, they were required to take them at separate meals. The order of the "concomitant" and "separate" periods was randomized. Phosphate-binding agents were stopped for a one-week washout period before each study period. The total dose of sevelamer and calcium carbonate for each subject remained the same for the whole duration of the study and had been determined according to their usual dose of phosphate binders. Patients were instructed to keep their usual eating habits constant and a nutritionist evaluated the daily phosphate intake three times per week. Dialysis parameters were kept constant. Pre-dialysis serum phosphate, calcium, bicarbonate, and albumin were measured at the end of each week. The average daily dietary phosphate intake remained unchanged throughout the study. At the end of the two study periods there was no significant difference in serum phosphate (1.50 +/- 0.46 mmol/L in the "concomitant" period vs. 1.51 +/- 0.31 mmol/L in the "separate" period, P = 0.97), calcium (2.26 +/- 0.19 mmol/L in the "concomitant" period vs. 2.27 +/- 0.15 mmol/L in the "separate" period, P = 0.64), calcium x phosphate product (3.36 +/- 0.94 mmol(2)/L(2) in the "concomitant" period vs. 3.41 +/- 0.71 mmol(2)/L(2) in the "separate" period, P = 0.84) and bicarbonate levels (21.5 +/- 3.3 mmol/L for the "concomitant" period vs. 21.6 +/- 3.1 mmol/L for the "separate" period, P = 0.81). Our results show that simultaneous administration of calcium carbonate and sevelamer does not decrease phosphate-binding capacity. Hence, patients can choose to take their phosphate binders concomitantly or at separate meals, according to their preference.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score0.230

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTherapeutic Apheresis and DialysisSame topicParathyroid Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207