MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2083741227 · doi:10.7202/039395ar

Le chien Tempest dans deux romans du Grand Nord canadien de Louis-Frédéric Rouquette (1884-1926)*

2010· article· fr· W2083741227 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
François-Xavier Eygun

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers franco-canadiens de l Ouest · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsMount Saint Vincent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTempestHumanitiesArtArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Louis-Frédéric Rouquette est surtout connu pour ses romans d’aventure dont certains se déroulent au Canada. Dans deux de ses romans qui traitent de la quête de l’or à la fin du XIXe siècle au Yukon et en Alaska, Rouquette met en scène un chien de traîneau: Tempest. Ce chien, pour des raisons évidentes, prend une dimension narrative et symbolique de premier ordre et devient le centre même de l’intrigue. Ce rôle de l’animal en littérature sera analysé pour tenter de comprendre et d’expliquer pourquoi un romancier comme Rouquette a pu dédier son livre à son chien.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.386
Threshold uncertainty score0.777

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0250.017
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers franco-canadiens de l Ouest→Same topicIndigenous Studies and Ecology→French-language works237,207→