MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083803720 · doi:10.1080/15435075.2012.740706

An Inexact Dynamic Optimization Model for CO<sub>2</sub>Emission Reduction in Subei Region, Northeast China

2012· article· en· W2083803720 on OpenAlexaff
Yongqian Liu, Guohe Huang, Yanpeng Cai, Cong Dong

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Green Energy · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater resources management and optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinear programmingFuzzy logicReduction (mathematics)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationInteger programmingCoalContext (archaeology)Interval (graph theory)Environmental scienceOperations researchEngineeringMathematicsWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, an inexact mixed-integer fuzzy robust linear programming model for coupled management of coal and power with consideration of CO2 emissions mitigation system planning (IMIFLP-CCPM) was developed under uncertainty. This model could reach into the closed relationship and interactive characteristics of China’s coal production, electric power generation, and CO2 emissions in coupled coal and power management system and thus explore the applicability of the decarburization facilities and mechanism incorporated in the system through scenario analysis. Based on the integration of interval linear programming, fuzzy robust linear programming, and mixed-integer linear programming, the IMIFLP-CCPM could effectively incorporate and handle uncertainties presented in terms of interval values and fuzzy sets. Also, dynamic analysis of capacity expansion, facility improvement, and inventory planning within a multi-period and multi-option context could be facilitated in this model. The developed IMIFLP-CCPM was applied to a long-term coupled coal and power management with CO2 reduction systems in Subei region, Northeast China. One base scenario and four CO2 reduction scenarios were presented and analyzed to examine the optimal coal-flow allocation patterns and carbon mitigation schemes for the studied system when forced to comply with a given CO2 emission limit. The results indicated that the IMIFLP-CCPM model could provide in-depth analysis of tradeoffs between system costs, energy security, and CO2 emission reduction, thus helping investigate interactive relationships among multiple economical, environmental, and energy structural targets within the study system. Moreover, the attempt of planning coupled coal and power management with CO2 mitigation under uncertainty would provide an effective reference to cope with the dilemma of energy development and CO2 mitigation under the climate change situation in China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.102

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Green EnergySame topicWater resources management and optimizationFrench-language works237,207