MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083832372 · doi:10.1080/08838151.2014.906436

Exploring Attribution of Responsibility in a Cross-National Study of TV News Coverage of the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen

2014· article· en· W2083832372 on OpenAlex
Xuan Liang, Jiun-Yi Tsai, Kristine Mattis, Magda Konieczna, Sharon Dunwoody

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClimate Change Communication and Perception
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttributionPolitical scienceClimate changeAdvertisingMedia studiesPsychologyBusinessSociologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractThis study investigates how prime-time television news portrayed attributions of responsibility for climate change policy issues in the United States, China, and Canada. In analyzing news coverage of the 2009 climate change summit in Copenhagen, we distinguish between causal and treatment responsibility. Additionally, we develop frames to test Cerutti's conceptualization of responsibility attribution (2010). The results suggest that television news in the 3 countries portrayed treatment responsibility differently. The prominence of morality, global justice, and national efficacy frames varied across countries, and these conditions were associated with the treatment responsibility frame, partially lending support to the validity of Cerutti's conceptualization. Additional informationNotes on contributorsXuan LiangXuan Liang (M.A., University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee) is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Life Sciences Communication at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Her research focuses on the intersection of science, media, and the public with an emphasis on the online environment.Jiun-Yi TsaiJiun-Yi Tsai (M.A., University of Florida) is a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Journalism and Mass Communication at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Her research interests focus on the intersections of media psychology, strategic risk and health communication.Kristine MattisKristine Mattis (M.S., University of North Dakota) is a Ph.D. candidate in Environment and Resources at the Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Her research focuses on communication of environmental health and ecological risks.Magda KoniecznaMagda Konieczna (M.J., University of British Columbia, Canada) is a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Journalism and Mass Communication at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She studies nonprofit news organizations and the future of public affairs journalism.Sharon DunwoodySharon Dunwoody (Ph.D. Indiana University) is Evjue-Bascom Professor Emerita in the School of Journalism and Mass Communication at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She studies the construction of science and environmental messages, as well as the ways in which the public interprets and uses such messages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.600
GPT teacher head0.461
Teacher spread0.139 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it