MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Heterotaxia syndromes and their abdominal manifestations

2006· review· en· W2083834497 on OpenAlexaff
Steven H. Borenstein, Jacob C. Langer

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Pediatrics · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenMcMaster Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsymptomaticAbdominal painNatural historyIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Children with heterotaxia often have abnormalities of intestinal rotation, some of which may predispose to midgut volvulus. This review summarizes the literature and proposes an individualized approach to the patient based on symptoms and findings on gastrointestinal imaging. RECENT FINDINGS: This report reviews the types of heterotaxia syndromes and the debate surrounding the optimal management of the associated intestinal rotational abnormalities. Recent publications suggest that not all rotational abnormalities predispose to volvulus and that the natural history of rotational abnormalities in asymptomatic patients with heterotaxia is relatively benign. On the basis of these findings, an algorithm for the management of intestinal rotational abnormalities is proposed. SUMMARY: Malrotation and midgut volvulus is a life-threatening complication. Children with heterotaxia and symptoms suggestive of a proximal intestinal obstruction require urgent investigation and surgical treatment. Asymptomatic children require close clinical follow-up and urgent investigation of gastrointestinal symptoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in PediatricsSame topicIntestinal Malrotation and Obstruction DisordersFrench-language works237,207