Molecular Dynamics of Localized Reaction, Experiment and Theory: Methyl Bromide on Si(111)-7×7
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An earlier experimental study by scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) from this laboratory described the use of "localized reaction" as a means to the electron- or photon-imprinting of self-assembled patterns of CH(3)Br(ad) as covalently bound Br-Si(s) at Si(111)-7x7. Here we show that the thermal surface bromination reaction by CH(3)Br(ad) is also highly localized, and present a detailed ab initio dynamical model for the reaction, using DFT. Localization is seen to be due to the coexistence in the reactive transition-state of the neighboring bonds being broken (C-Br) and formed (Br-Si). Both experiment and theory are consistent with a low energy-barrier, E(a) approximately 0.2 eV, for the thermal bromination of Si(111) by CH(3)Br(ad), and also for the desorption of intact CH(3)Br(g) (E(des) approximately 0.2 eV). Two physisorbed states of CH(3)Br(ad)/Si(111) (I and II) are distinguishable by STM at 50 K by their differing displacement from the underlying Si adatom. These states can be identified with similarly displaced states in the STM images simulated by DFT. At the elevated temperature of 80 K, a markedly displaced physisorbed state (III) appears in the STM image, indicated by DFT to have a configuration encountered along the reaction path immediately prior to the transition state. The electron-induced bromination of Si(111) by CH(3)Br(ad), and also electron-induced molecular desorption, are examined as a function of the energy of the incident electron, giving for both processes a threshold energy of E(e) approximately 1.8 eV in accord with ab initio theory, and a substantial yield of 10(-6) to 10(-5) Br-Si(s)/electron.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".