MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083849880 · doi:10.1063/1.3647222

Note: Mechanical and electrical characterization of nanowires in scanning electron microscope

2011· article· en· W2083849880 on OpenAlexaff
Changhai Ru, Lining Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Scientific Instruments · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsNanowireMaterials scienceCharacterization (materials science)Scanning electron microscopeCapacitive sensingMicroelectromechanical systemsActuatorPiezoresistive effectNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsComposite materialComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This note presents two experimental techniques for mechanical and electrical characterization of individual nanowires inside a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Tensile testing is realized by transferring a nanowire to a microelectromechanical systems device that stretches the nanowire and measures the elongations and tensile forces. The device consists of an electrostatic actuator and two capacitive sensors, capable of acquiring all measurement data (force and displacement) electronically without relying on electron microscopy imaging. For electrical characterization, four-point probe measurement of individual nanowires is performed automatically by controlling four nanomanipulators with SEM visual feedback. A feedforward controller is incorporated into the control system to improve the response time. This work represents advances in nanomaterial testing and automated nanomanipulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Scientific InstrumentsSame topicForce Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207