MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083851878 · doi:10.4161/psb.3.10.5936

Glutamate deamination by glutamate dehydrogenase plays a central role in amino acid catabolism in plants

2008· article· en· W2083851878 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Signaling & Behavior · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGABA and Rice Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyCatabolismGlutamate dehydrogenaseDeaminationGlutamate receptorBiochemistryAmino acidOxidative deaminationGlutamate synthaseEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glutamate is of central importance in plant N metabolism since the biosynthesis of all other amino acids requires this compound. Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH; EC 1.4.1.2), which catalyzes in vitro reversible reductive amination of 2-oxoglutatre to form glutamate, is a key player in the metabolism of glutamate. While most previous studies have indicated that the oxidative deamination is the in vivo direction of the GDH reaction, its physiological role has remained ambiguous for decades. We have recently isolated mutants for the two known Arabidopsis GDH genes and created a gdh double mutant. Our recent work revealed an increased susceptibility of the gdh double mutant to dark-induced C starvation, the first phenotype associated with the loss of GDH activity in plants. Monitoring the amino acid breakdown during the dark treatment also suggested that the deamination of glutamate catalyzed by GDH is central to the catabolism of many other amino acids. Addendum to: Miyashita Y, Good AG. NAD(H)-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase is essential for the survival of Arabidopsis thaliana during dark-induced carbon starvation. J Exp Bot 2008; 59:667-80.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it