Glutamate deamination by glutamate dehydrogenase plays a central role in amino acid catabolism in plants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glutamate is of central importance in plant N metabolism since the biosynthesis of all other amino acids requires this compound. Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH; EC 1.4.1.2), which catalyzes in vitro reversible reductive amination of 2-oxoglutatre to form glutamate, is a key player in the metabolism of glutamate. While most previous studies have indicated that the oxidative deamination is the in vivo direction of the GDH reaction, its physiological role has remained ambiguous for decades. We have recently isolated mutants for the two known Arabidopsis GDH genes and created a gdh double mutant. Our recent work revealed an increased susceptibility of the gdh double mutant to dark-induced C starvation, the first phenotype associated with the loss of GDH activity in plants. Monitoring the amino acid breakdown during the dark treatment also suggested that the deamination of glutamate catalyzed by GDH is central to the catabolism of many other amino acids. Addendum to: Miyashita Y, Good AG. NAD(H)-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase is essential for the survival of Arabidopsis thaliana during dark-induced carbon starvation. J Exp Bot 2008; 59:667-80.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".