MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083886113 · doi:10.1177/0021140012443635

The Hermeneutic of Reform as a Task for Theology

2012· article· en· W2083886113 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIrish Theological Quarterly · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicChristian Theology and Mission
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHermeneuticsReading (process)NegotiationContext (archaeology)Holy SeeTheologyTask (project management)Discontinuity (linguistics)PhilosophySociologyReligious studiesLawHistoryPolitical scienceLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The lecture on hermeneutics given by Pope Benedict XVI to the Roman curia on 22 December 2005 led to various interpretations. Many thought that the pope then proposed practising a hermeneutic of continuity, when he explicitly opposed to a hermeneutic of discontinuity one of reform. Read in its context, however, it is clear that this magisterial lecture was addressed to the Lefebvrists, who wished to be re-integrated into the Catholic Church. In fact, an attentive reading of the text shows that Benedict XVI takes up those themes that he had developed earlier in his negotiations with Mgr Marcel Lefebvre, who not only rejected the Vatican II Council and wished to abolish and revise certain documents, but also claimed that the Church that adheres to the Council is a new Church, a modernist Church, that is in rupture with tradition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.503
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it