MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of antihypertensive treatments on erectile responses in aging spontaneously hypertensive rats

2005· article· en· W2083892452 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hypertension · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHydralazineEnalaprilUrologyErectile dysfunctionHydrochlorothiazideBlood pressureInternal medicineLosartanEndocrinologyAngiotensin-converting enzymeAngiotensin II

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: We previously demonstrated that brief, aggressive antihypertensive therapy recovered erectile function in 40-week-old spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). The present study examined the impact of antihypertensive and testosterone treatments on erectile function in aging SHR. DESIGN AND METHODS: Centrally initiated erections were determined in response to apomorphine throughout. At 30 and 49 weeks, SHR were treated for 2 weeks with enalapril or hydralazine. A third more aggressive treatment (68 weeks) involved enalapril or losartan plus a low salt diet or a triple therapy (hydralazine, nifedipine, hydrochlorothiazide). In a separate study, cross-over kidney transplantations were performed between untreated and losartan-treated SHR. Arterial pressure was assessed post-transplantation using radio-telemetric transducers. RESULTS: There was an age-related decrease in erections between 30 and 68 weeks (3.1 +/- 0.79 versus 0.2 +/- 0.38) that was not improved by testosterone administration. Early treatment with enalapril or hydralazine did not prevent this decline, although the second treatment resulted in significant improvements (enalapril, 0.8 +/- 0.70; hydralazine, 0.8 +/- 0.41 versus control, 0.3 +/- 0.60). A 2-week aggressive antihypertensive treatment at 68 weeks increased erections approximately two-fold, with the previously treated rats receiving triple therapy having markedly improved erectile responses (0.2 +/- 0.53 versus 1.1 +/- 1.67). In the transplantation study, previously losartan-treated SHR given an untreated kidney had higher arterial pressure but twice the number of erections in comparison with the SHR with lower arterial pressure resulting from transplanting a treated kidney. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive antihypertensive treatments may be more beneficial in improving erectile function in aged SHR, via an effect that appears to be tissue specific, and not based on changes in blood pressure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.730
Threshold uncertainty score0.616

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it