MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of antihypertensive treatments on erectile responses in aging spontaneously hypertensive rats

2005· article· en· W2083892452 on OpenAlexaff
Johanna L. Hannan, Corry Smallegange, Taben M. Hale, Jeremy P.W. Heaton, Michael A. Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hypertension · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHydralazineEnalaprilUrologyErectile dysfunctionHydrochlorothiazideBlood pressureInternal medicineLosartanEndocrinologyAngiotensin-converting enzymeAngiotensin II

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: We previously demonstrated that brief, aggressive antihypertensive therapy recovered erectile function in 40-week-old spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). The present study examined the impact of antihypertensive and testosterone treatments on erectile function in aging SHR. DESIGN AND METHODS: Centrally initiated erections were determined in response to apomorphine throughout. At 30 and 49 weeks, SHR were treated for 2 weeks with enalapril or hydralazine. A third more aggressive treatment (68 weeks) involved enalapril or losartan plus a low salt diet or a triple therapy (hydralazine, nifedipine, hydrochlorothiazide). In a separate study, cross-over kidney transplantations were performed between untreated and losartan-treated SHR. Arterial pressure was assessed post-transplantation using radio-telemetric transducers. RESULTS: There was an age-related decrease in erections between 30 and 68 weeks (3.1 +/- 0.79 versus 0.2 +/- 0.38) that was not improved by testosterone administration. Early treatment with enalapril or hydralazine did not prevent this decline, although the second treatment resulted in significant improvements (enalapril, 0.8 +/- 0.70; hydralazine, 0.8 +/- 0.41 versus control, 0.3 +/- 0.60). A 2-week aggressive antihypertensive treatment at 68 weeks increased erections approximately two-fold, with the previously treated rats receiving triple therapy having markedly improved erectile responses (0.2 +/- 0.53 versus 1.1 +/- 1.67). In the transplantation study, previously losartan-treated SHR given an untreated kidney had higher arterial pressure but twice the number of erections in comparison with the SHR with lower arterial pressure resulting from transplanting a treated kidney. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive antihypertensive treatments may be more beneficial in improving erectile function in aged SHR, via an effect that appears to be tissue specific, and not based on changes in blood pressure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HypertensionSame topicSexual function and dysfunction studiesFrench-language works237,207