THE NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF FLOW AROUND EJECTION SYSTEM
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aerodynamic characteristics of an Ejection Seat System at different angles of attack are studied by the numerical method and the flow mechanisms for such flows are carefully analyzed. The governing equations are Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations which are solved by the unstructured finite volume method. Upwind Osher scheme is used for spatial discretization and five-stage Runge-Kutta scheme is applied for temporal discretization. The DES model based on S-A one equation turbulence model is adopted. Parallel computation is based on the domain decomposition method and multi-block is achieved by using METIS system. The experimental data is used to validate this method. This research is helpful to understand the aerodynamic characteristics and flow mechanisms of Ejection Seat System at different angles of attack and Mach numbers, and can provide reasonable reference for Ejection Seat System design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it