Trapping zones: The effect of fracture roughness on the directional anisotropy of fluid flow and colloid transport in a single fracture
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we quantify the influence of geometry and distribution of surface roughness to the directional anisotropy of fluid flow and transport properties of a single fracture. Roughness of fractures appears to have first order control on how they behave mechanically and hydraulically. We directly quantified the surface roughness of a single fracture using high‐resolution laser scanning confocal microscopy. This roughness was input into directly coupled numerical models of fluid flow and transport. We simulated the transport of colloids (microspheres) through the fracture. We found tailing in the breakthrough and sensitivity of the breakthrough to flow direction in the fracture. Microspheres were observed to be trapped in low velocity zones on the lee side of fracture walls. This was not observed in smooth or sinusoidal varying fracture wall geometries. These observations have significant implications for quantifying the transport of dissolved and solid phase materials (colloids) through fractured rock.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it