Spaceflight affects bone formation in rhesus monkeys: a histological and cell culture study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using analyses of iliac crest cell and tissue, back-scattered electron imaging, and biochemical techniques, we characterized the effects of a 14-day spaceflight (Bion 11) on bone structure and bone formation in two 3- to 4-yr-old male rhesus monkeys compared with eight age-matched Earth-control monkeys. We found that postflight bone volume was 35% lower than preflight values in flight monkeys. This was associated with reduced osteoid (-40%) and mineralizing (-32%) surfaces and decreased bone formation rate (-53%). Moreover, flight monkeys exhibited trends to lower values of mineralization profile in iliac bone (back-scattered electron imaging) and to decreased osteocalcin serum levels (P = 0.08). The initial number of trabecular bone cells yielded in cultures did not differ in flight and control animals before or after the flight. However, osteoblastic cell proliferation was markedly lower in postflight vs. preflight at 9 and 14 days of culture in one flight monkey. This study suggests that a 14-day spaceflight reduces iliac bone formation, osteoblastic activity, and/or recruitment in young rhesus monkeys, resulting in decreased trabecular bone volume.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".