Atmospheres of Protoplanetary Cores: Critical Mass for Nucleated Instability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We systematically study quasi-static atmospheres of accreting protoplanetary cores for different opacity behaviors and realistic planetesimal accretion rates in various parts of the protoplanetary nebula. We demonstrate that there are two important classes of atmospheres: (1) those having an outer convective zone that smoothly merges with the surrounding nebular gas, and (2) those possessing an almost isothermal outer radiative region that effectively decouples the atmospheric interior from the nebula. The type of atmosphere accumulating around a given core depends on the core mass, nebular parameters, and accretion luminosity of the core. Cores in the inner parts of the protoplanetary disk (within roughly 0.3 AU from the Sun) have large luminosities resulting in atmospheres of the first type, while cores in the giant planet region (beyond several AU) have small accretion luminosities and always accumulate massive atmospheres of the second type. The critical core mass needed for the nucleated instability to commence is found to vary considerably as a function of distance from the Sun. This mass is 5-20 M ⊕ at 0.1-1 AU, which is too large to permit the formation of "hot Jupiters" by nucleated instability around the cores that have grown in situ. In the region of giant planets the critical core mass depends on the gas opacity and planetesimal accretion rate but is insensitive to the nebular temperature or density provided that the opacity in the outer radiative region does not depend on the gas density (e.g., dust opacity). The critical mass in the region of giant planets can be as high as 20-60 M ⊕ (for an opacity of 0.1 cm 2 g -1 ) if planetesimal accretion is fast enough for protoplanetary cores to form prior to the nebular gas dissipation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".