MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083940829 · doi:10.1159/000365058

Atherosclerotic Markers in Obese and Nonobese Children and Relationship with Nighttime Hypertension

2014· letter· en· W2083940829 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Principles and Practice · 2014
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineSerum amyloid AInsulin resistanceEndocrinologyFibrinogenApolipoprotein BProspective cohort studyLipoproteinC-reactive proteinCholesterolInflammationObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dear Editor,We have read the article by Tekin et al. [1] entitled ‘Ambulatory blood pressure parameters in office normotensive obese and non-obese children: relationship with insulin resistance and atherosclerotic markers' with great interest. The authors suggested that the ratio of high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and the ratio of total cholesterol (TC) to HDL-C in children and adolescents might be risk factors for nighttime hypertension. However, we think there are some points that should be mentioned as contributory factors.Several large prospective studies, including AMORIS, INTERHEART, the Quebec Cardiovascular Study, and MONICA/KORA, have clearly shown that the apolipoprotein (apo) B:apo A-I ratio, which represents the balance of atherogenic and antiatherogenic lipoproteins, is a superior marker of coronary heart disease risk compared to all conventional markers, including the TC:HDL-C and LDL-C:HDL-C ratios [2,3]. Prospective epidemiological studies have shown that increased vascular risk was associated with increased basal levels of cytokines, such as interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α, cell adhesion molecules, such as soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1, P-selectin and E-selectin, and decreased acute-phase reactants, such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, fibrinogen and serum amyloid A [4]. In this regard, apo B and apo A-I measurement could have been used to obtain more reliable data, or at least several additional risk markers as stated above, and also the TC:HDL-C and LDL-C:HDL-C ratios.Although the authors have suggested that high LDL-C:HDL-C and TC:HDL-C ratios in children and adolescents might be risk factors for nighttime hypertension, we think the main relationship is between hypertension and obesity itself [5,6]. We further believe this study suggested that elevated nighttime systolic blood pressure was associated with an increased risk of being obese.Lastly, in order to prevent misunderstandings, the authors should define clearly whether there was a relationship between insulin resistance, determined by homeostasis model assessment, and nighttime hypertension. In this way, an explanation of these concerns would certainly provide the readers with clearer information.ReplyBetul ErsoyDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Celal Bayer University, Manisa, Turkey Dear Editor,Thank you for your interest in our study [1]. We have already followed up approximately 2,500 obese children and adolescents in our outpatient clinic and evaluated the lipid profiles in all of them. The low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio and total cholesterol (TC) to HDL-C ratios are simple tests in clinical practice used to evaluate atherosclerosis in children and adolescents, as well as in adults. In the AMORIS study, the authors reported that the apolipoprotein (apo) B:apo A-I ratio was important for the prediction of future cardiac death in adults [2]. Similarly, Juonala et al. [3] reported that the apo B:apo A-I ratio measured in adolescence was superior to the LDL-C:HDL-C ratio for the prediction of subclinical atherosclerosis determined by carotid intima media thickness in adults. We would like to emphasize once more that our study was performed in children and adolescents, not adults. The evaluation of apo B and apo A-I is not possible in routine clinical practice in all obese patients, but the lipid profile can easily be assessed routinely in all obese patients. Therefore, the evaluation of the LDL-C:HDL-C and TC:HDL-C ratios is simple and easy for the prediction of atherosclerosis. Furthermore, we used these ratios for the prediction of masked hypertension diagnosed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM).The majority of our obese patients did not have office hypertension. However, office blood pressure (BP) measurements may be misleading for the diagnosis of hypertension in obese children and even in healthy children. Masked hypertension is a clinical condition in which office BP is normal but there are hypertensive values in ABPM. Therefore, ABPM should be performed to diagnose those patients with masked hypertension. Additionally, ABPM is also helpful in the evaluation of nondipping BP and isolated nighttime hypertension [4]. Nighttime hypertension is defined as ambulatory systolic or diastolic BP levels ≥95th percentile of height- and sex-adjusted nighttime reference values. Patients were further classified as nondippers if their day to night BP difference was below 10% [4]. We investigated a simple predictor for ambulatory hypertension and nondipping pattern because it is not practical to perform ABPM in all obese children. We believe the LDL-C:HDL-C and TC:HDL-C ratios will be simple and useful predictors for the nighttime hypertension and the indication of APBM in clinical practice, particularly in obese children.We found that some of the ambulatory BP parameters are significantly higher in obese children compared to their nonobese peers. Despite a nonsignificant difference, the frequency of nighttime hypertension is higher in obese than nonobese children. In the literature, there is no study comparing ambulatory BP parameters between obese and nonobese children. The other question is the relationship between the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and nighttime hypertension. We found positive correlations between HOMA-IR and nighttime BP values. However, logistic regression analysis revealed no association between the two. In other words, HOMA-IR is not a predictor for nighttime hypertension. Hvidt et al. [5] reported similar results in obese children and adolescents.References1 Tekin N, Ersoy B, Coskun S, et al: Ambulatory blood pressure parameters in office normotensive obese and non-obese children: relationship with insulin resistance and atherosclerotic markers. Med Princ Pract 2014;23:154-159.2 Walldius G, Jungner I, Holme I, et al: High apolipoprotein B, low apolipoprotein A-I, and improvement in the prediction of fatal myocardial infarction (AMORIS study): a prospective study. Lancet 2001;358:2026-2033.3 Juonala, M, Viikari JSA, Kähönen M, et al: Childhood levels of serum apolipoproteins B and A-I predict carotid intima-media thickness and brachial endothelial function in adulthood. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:293-299.4 Krzych LJ, Szydlowski L: Determinants of inappropriate circadian blood pressure variability in children with essential hypertension. Can J Cardiol 2009;25:e13-e16.5 Hvidt KN, Olsen MH, Ibsen H, et al: Effect of changes in BMI and waist circumference on ambulatory blood pressure in obese children and adolescents. J Hypertens 2014;32:1470-1477.Betül Ersoy, MD52/100 SokakNo. 7/9TR-35350 Esendere-İzmir (Turkey)E-Mail betul_e@hotmail.com

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.541
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it