MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084005696 · doi:10.1515/nleng-2014-0004

Axle Load Identification of Moving Vehicles Based on Influence Lines of Bridge Bending Moment

2014· article· en· W2084005696 on OpenAlexaff
C.Z. Qian, C.P Chen, Hong Li, Liming Dai

Bibliographic record

VenueNonlinear Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMoving loadBending momentStructural engineeringInfluence lineMoment (physics)ModalAxleAccelerationBridge (graph theory)Moment of inertiaMatrix (chemical analysis)EngineeringPhysicsMaterials scienceFinite element methodClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This research aims at the identification of time varying axle load of moving vehicles though the determinations of influence lines of bridge bending moment.With the approach of this research, based on the theorem of modal superposition, the modal acceleration of the bridge subjected to moving loads is determined by the responding acceleration data of the sections. At any given time, the dynamic moment at a section is considered as a static moment due to the distributed inertia force and moving loads on the bridge. By using the bending moment influence line of the bridge, the relationship between the moments and the moving load is established. A method for identifying the moving loads though the bending moment influence lines is thus developed.With the application of the matrix singularity, there is no need to solve for dynamic equations and ill-conditioned matrix, and thus the proposed method is highly effcient for engineering applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.723

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNonlinear EngineeringSame topicStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesFrench-language works237,207