MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084024989 · doi:10.7202/500904ar

Au-delà du langage, c'est la mort d'un bavard

2005· article· fr· W2084024989 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anthony Wall

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes littéraires · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSpectaclePhilosophyArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le Bavard de Louis-René des Forêts nous livre le spectacle de celui qui ne dit rien. Ce spectacle doit se comprendre comme un énoncé performatif dont les limites s'étendent bien au-delà de quelques mots ou structures isolés. Si nous étudions la performativité en tant qu'événement, nous voyons, grâce à ce roman, que tout sens se lie en dernière analyse à la mort de l'acteur et de son spectacle. Le texte de des Forêts creuse sous la surface du langage parce qu'il crée du sens à partir de ce qui compose le discours vide d'un bavard. Ainsi voit le jour une série de verbes performatifs d'apparence intolérable: «Je parle», «Je mens» et «Je meurs».

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.582
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes littérairesSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207