The core oligosaccharide component from <i>Mannheimia (Pasteurella) haemolytica</i> serotype Al lipopolysaccharide contains <scp>L</scp>-<i>glycero</i>-<scp>D</scp>-<i>manno</i>- and <scp>D</scp>-<i>glycero</i>-<scp>D</scp>-<i>manno</i>-heptoses: Analysis of the structure and conformation by high-resolution NMR spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous studies from our laboratory have indicated that the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Mannheimia haemolytica serotype A1 contains both L-glycero-D-manno-heptose and D-glycero-D-manno-heptose residues. NMR methods making use of 1D 1H selective excitation and 2D (1H, 13C) and (1H, 31P) heteronuclear experiments were used for the structural determination of the major core oligosaccharide components of the deacylated low-molecular-mass LPS obtained following sequential treatment with anhydrous hydrazine and aq KOH. The core oligosaccharide region was found to be composed of a branched octasaccharide linked to the deacylated lipid A moiety via a 3-deoxy-4-phospho-D-manno-oct-2-ulosonate residue having the structure,[Formula: see text]Heterogeneity was found to be present at several linkages. NMR methods were devised to distinguish between the diastereomeric forms of the heptose residues. Synthesized monosaccharides of L-D- and D-D-heptose were used as model compounds for analysis of the 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts and proton coupling constants. Molecular modeling using a Monte Carlo method for conformational analysis of saccharides was used to determine the conformation of the inner core of the oligosaccharide and to establish the stereochemical relationships between the heptoses.Key words: LPS, NMR, conformation, oligosaccharide, heptose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".