MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084042104 · doi:10.5414/np300575

Probable IgG4-related pachymeningitis: a case with transverse sinus obliteration

2013· article· en· W2084042104 on OpenAlexaff
Jantima Tanboon, Michelle M. Felicella, Juan M. Bilbao, Todd G. Mainprize, Arie Perry

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Neuropathology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIgG4-Related and Inflammatory Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeningesMedicineIgG4-related diseaseDifferential diagnosisPathologySinus (botany)LesionMagnetic resonance imagingMeningiomaFibrosisDura materRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a recently recognized fibro-inflammatory condition which often shows a dramatic response to steroid therapy. IgG4-RD can present either as a single lesion or as a systemic multi-organ disorder. Common histological findings include a dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate rich in IgG4-positive plasma cells, storiform fibrosis, and phlebitis. Although diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RD have been proposed in many organs/sites, they are not well established in the central nervous system. Published data on IgG4-RD in meninges is also limited. To our knowledge, only 15 potential cases of meningeal IgG4-RD have been reported. We add a case of probable IgG4-related pachymeningitis in a 42-year-old woman who presented with headache and left transverse sinus obstruction. Follow-up after 2-months of high dose steroids shows dramatic clinical and imaging improvement. The differential diagnosis for IgG4-related pachymeningitis, including lymphoplasmacyte-rich meningioma, idiopathic hypertrophic pachymeningitis, and lymphoproliferative disease is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical NeuropathologySame topicIgG4-Related and Inflammatory DiseasesFrench-language works237,207