MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084046783 · doi:10.1021/jz502654q

Tuning the Attempt Frequency of Protein Folding Dynamics via Transition-State Rigidification: Application to Trp-Cage

2015· article· en· W2084046783 on OpenAlexaff
Rachel M. Abaskharon, Robert M. Culik, G. Andrew Woolley, Feng Gai

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Structure and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCageFolding (DSP implementation)Protein foldingDynamics (music)State (computer science)Transition (genetics)BiophysicsChemistryChemical physicsPhysicsComputer scienceEngineeringBiologyAcousticsMechanical engineeringStructural engineeringBiochemistryAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The attempt frequency or prefactor (k0) of the transition-state rate equation of protein folding kinetics has been estimated to be on the order of 10(6) s(-1), which is many orders of magnitude smaller than that of chemical reactions. Herein we use the mini-protein Trp-cage to show that it is possible to significantly increase the value of k0 for a protein folding reaction by rigidifying the transition state. This is achieved by reducing the conformational flexibility of a key structural element (i.e., an α-helix) formed in the transition state via photoisomerization of an azobenzene cross-linker. We find that this strategy not only decreases the folding time of the Trp-cage peptide by more than an order of magnitude (to ∼100 ns at 25°C) but also exposes parallel folding pathways, allowing us to provide, to the best of our knowledge, the first quantitative assessment of the curvature of the transition-state free-energy surface of a protein.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry LettersSame topicProtein Structure and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207