MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084049708 · doi:10.1021/es0305555

Indoor and Outdoor Air Concentrations and Phase Partitioning of Perfluoroalkyl Sulfonamides and Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers

2004· article· en· W2084049708 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerfluorooctanePolybrominated diphenyl ethersEnvironmental chemistryChemistryParticulatesPartition coefficientVapor pressurePollutantPersistent organic pollutantVolatile organic compoundIndoor airEnvironmental scienceSulfonateEnvironmental engineeringChromatographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perfluoroalkyls (PFAs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) are two classes of emerging persistent organic pollutants (POPs) that are widely used in domestic and workplace products. These compounds also occur in remote locations such as the Arctic where they are accumulated in the food chain. This study makes connections between indoor sources of these chemicals and the potential and mode for their transport in air. In the case of the PFAs, three perfluoralkyl sulfonamides (PFASs) were investigated--N-methyl perfluorooctane sulfonamidoethanol (MeFOSE), N-ethyl perfluorooctane sulfonamidoethanol (EtFOSE), and N-methyl perfluorooctane sulfonamidethylacrylate (MeFOSEA). These are believed to act as precursors that eventually degrade to perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), which is detected in samples from remote regions. High-volume samples were collected for indoor and outdoor air to investigate the source signature and strength. Mean indoor air concentrations (pg/m3) were 2590 (MeFOSE), 770 (EtFOSE), and 630 (sigmaPBDE). The ratios of concentration between indoor and outdoor air were 110 for MeFOSE, 85 for EtFOSE, and 15 for sigmaPBDE. The gas and particle phases were collected separately to investigate the partitioning characteristics of these chemicals. Measured particulate percentages were compared to predicted values determined using models based on the octanol-air partition coefficient (K(OA)) and supercooled liquid vapor pressure (pL(o)); these models were previously developed for nonpolar, hydrophobic chemicals. To make this comparison for the three PFASs, it was necessary to measure their K(OA) and vapor pressure. K(OA) values were measured as a function of temperature (0 to +20 degrees C). Values of log K(OA) at 20 degrees C were 7.70, 7.78, and 7.87 for MeFOSE, EtFOSE, and MeFOSEA, respectively. Partitioning to octanol increased at colder temperatures, and the enthalpies associated with octanol-air transfer (deltaH(OA), kJ/mol) were 68-73 and consistent with previous measurements for nonpolar hydrophobic chemicals. Solid-phase vapor pressures (pS(o)) were measured at room temperature (23 degrees C) by the gas saturation method. Values of pS(o) (Pa) were 4.0 x 10(-4), 1.7 x 10(-3), and 4.1 x 10(-4), respectively. These were converted to pL(o) for describing particle-gas exchange. Both the pL(o)-based model and the K(OA) model worked well for the PBDEs but were not valid for the PFASs, greatly underpredicting particulate percentages. These results suggest that existing K(OA)- and pL(o)-based models of partitioning will need to be recalibrated for PFASs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.009
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it