MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084059859 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2011.6091446

A low-power high-sensitivity CMOS mixed-signal seizure-onset detector

2011· article· en· W2084059859 on OpenAlexaff
Mona Safi-Harb, Muhammad Tariqus Salam, Shahriar Mirabbasi, Dang Khoa Nguyen, Mohamad Sawan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversity of British ColumbiaPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSensitivity (control systems)CMOSDetectorSIGNAL (programming language)Power (physics)Ultra low powerLow-power electronicsElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringComputer scienceOptoelectronicsMaterials sciencePhysicsEngineeringPower consumption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a new seizure detection algorithm and the associated CMOS circuitry implementation. The proposed low-power seizure detector is a good candidate for an implantable epilepsy prosthesis. The device is designed for patient-specific seizure detection with a one variable parameter. The parameter value is extracted from a single seizure that is subsequently excluded from the validation phase. A two-path system is also proposed to minimize the detection delay. The algorithm is first validated using MATLAB® tools and then implemented and validated using circuits designed in a standard 0.18-μm CMOS process with a total power dissipation of 7.08 μW. A total of 13 seizures from two drug-resistant epileptic patients are assessed using the proposed algorithm and resulted in 100% sensitivity and a mean detection delay of 9.7 s after electrical onset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207