The Influence of Gas and Liquid Flow Rates on the Transient Bubble Characteristics in a Liquid Cross-Flow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper reports on an experimental study conducted to investigate the dynamics of gas bubbles when injected from an orifice that is subjected to a liquid cross-flow. The experiments were conducted over a range of gas and liquid flow rates and at various orientations of the liquid channel. An image processing algorithm was developed for the detection and characterization of the bubbles in both temporal and spatial coordinates. The transient behaviour of bubble dynamics at different channel orientations under different liquid and gas flow conditions are presented in the paper. Results show that the equivalent bubble diameter in the vertical plane decreased with increase in time as well as with increase in the gas-to-liquid velocity ratio. The channel inclination has no appreciable effect on the bubble diameter. The streamwise bubble velocity showed significant transient fluctuations, which diminished with an increase in the channel inclination angle. The fluctuations of the bubble vertical velocity were found to be unaffected by the channel inclination angle. The magnitudes of both streamwise and vertical velocities were influenced by the channel inclination, however, the trends were found to be opposite.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".