MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084067034 · doi:10.1109/tsg.2014.2331175

A Monte Carlo Simulation Platform for Studying Low Voltage Residential Networks

2014· article· en· W2084067034 on OpenAlexafffund
Ricardo Torquato, Qingxin Shi, Wilsun Xu, Walmir Freitas

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsMonte Carlo methodSmart gridDemand responseComputer scienceSimulationVoltageGridEngineeringReliability engineeringElectricityElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The smart grid vision has resulted in many demand side innovations such as nonintrusive load monitoring techniques, residential micro-grids, and demand response programs. Many of these techniques need a detailed residential network model for their research, evaluation, and validation. In response to such a need, this paper presents a sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) simulation platform for modeling and simulating low voltage residential networks. This platform targets the simulation of the quasi-steady-state network condition over an extended period such as 24 h. It consists of two main components. The first is a multiphase network model with power flow, harmonic, and motor starting study capabilities. The second is a load/generation behavior model that establishes the operating characteristics of various loads and generators based on time-of-use probability curves. These two components are combined together through an SMC simulation scheme. Four case studies are presented to demonstrate the applications of the proposed platform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations104
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Smart GridSame topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207