MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084070187 · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/92/30003

Kubo formula for open finite-size systems

2010· article· en· W2084070187 on OpenAlexaff
Jinshan Wu, Mona Berciu

Bibliographic record

VenueEurophysics Letters (EPL) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDegenerate energy levelsKubo formulaThermalCoupling (piping)MathematicsStatistical physicsMathematical analysisPhysicsThermodynamicsQuantum mechanicsMaterials scienceConductivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We derive a Kubo-type formula that describes proper non-equilibrium stationary states for finite-size systems. We first argue that the usual Kubo formula considers only equilibrium states of the perturbed system, which are inappropriate to describe transport properties. Moreover, we show that the standard Kubo formula for the dc conductance is only appropriate in the thermodynamic limit. We demonstrate that taking into consideration explicitly the coupling to the leads/baths solves both problems. This approach results in well-behaved response functions, without the singular contributions from degenerate states encountered when Kubo formulae for infinite-size systems are inappropriately used for finite-size systems. We also derive a second, more efficient formulation which is valid only for a set of special physical quantities, which includes the charge current density operator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEurophysics Letters (EPL)Same topicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical MechanicsFrench-language works237,207