Numerical Characterization of the Area Perturbation and Timelag for a Vibrating Tube Subjected to Cross-Flow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fluidelastic instability can have disastrous effects on the integrity of steam generators. Over the last five decades there has been a great deal of research done in an attempt to understand this phenomenon. These efforts have resulted in several theoretical models and design guidelines. The semi-analytical model of fluidelastic instability initially developed by Lever and Weaver is based on a single tube in a channel flow. The mechanism responsible for instability was found to be one of flow redistribution. While previous studies have been able to characterize the pressure and velocity within a tube bundle, the behaviour of the area of the channel has not yet been fully investigated. The current study aims to characterize the area of the channel surrounding the tube. Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) equations are cast in an Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian (ALE) form and are used to compute the flow conditions in a rigid tube bundle due to a single flexible tube vibrating in the transverse direction. The properties of the velocity field are used to determine the channel boundaries. Properties of the channel area such as area perturbation, mean area, and area phase are investigated for various reduced flow velocities. Dynamic simulations are conducted to determine the impact on the stability threshold for transverse fluid force cases using a mass damping parameter range of 10–200.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".