MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084083167 · doi:10.2118/170057-ms

Phase Behaviour and Viscosity Reduction of CO2-Heavy Oil Systems at High Pressures and Elevated Temperatures

2014· article· en· W2084083167 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Heavy Oil Conference-Canada · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSaturation (graph theory)ThermodynamicsViscosityPhase (matter)Volume (thermodynamics)Materials scienceEquation of stateAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Volume fractionLogarithmChemistryMathematicsChromatographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Techniques have been developed to experimentally and theoretically determine phase behaviour and viscosity reduction of CO2-heavy oil systems at high pressures and elevated temperatures. Experimentally, vapour-liquid phase boundaries (i.e., saturation pressure lines) and the swelling factors are measured by conducting PVT tests at pressures up to 11094.0 kPa and temperatures up to 362.75 K, respectively. The viscosity of CO2-saturated heavy oil is measured at 319.15 K. Theoretically, the heavy oil sample is respectively characterized as a single- and multi-pseudocomponent(s). An exponential distribution function is used to split the plus fraction of heavy oil up to C105+, while a logarithm-type lumping method is used to group the single carbon numbers (SCNs) into multiple pseudocomponents. Then, the Peng-Robinson equation of state (PR EOS) coupled with the modified alpha function is applied to quantify the phase and volumetric behaviour of the CO2-heavy oil systems. The binary interaction parameters (BIPs) for CO2-pseudocomponent(s) pair are tuned to match the measured saturation pressures. Compared with the characterization scheme of treating heavy oil as a single pseudocomponent, the absolute average relative deviation (AARD) for the predicted saturation pressures can be improved from 5.27% to 4.56% by characterizing the heavy oil as six pseudocomponents. With the optimum BIPs, the swelling factors are predicted by the PR EOS with and without the volume translation technique, respectively. It is found that the introduction of the volume shift to each (pseudo)component in the PR EOS is able to provide more accurate prediction in both characterization schemes with AARD of 1.88% (oil as a single pseudocomponent) and 1.39% (oil as six pseudocomponents), respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it