MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084103493 · doi:10.1145/1321261.1321288

Compact and efficient generation of radiance transfer for dynamically articulated characters

2007· article· en· W2084103493 on OpenAlexafffund
Derek Nowrouzezahrai, Patricio Simari, Evangelos Kalogerakis, Karan Singh, Eugene Fiume

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHuman Motion and Animation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersMitacsNational Science Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceRadianceTransfer (computing)Computer graphics (images)VisualizationCurse of dimensionalitySimple (philosophy)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceParallel computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a data-driven technique for generating the precomputed radiance transfer vectors of an animated character as a function of its joint angles. We learn a linear model for generating real-time lighting effects on articulated characters while capturing soft self-shadows caused by dynamic distant lighting. Indirect illumination can also be reproduced using our framework. Previous data-driven techniques have either restricted the type of lighting response (generating only ambient occlusion), the type of animated sequences (response functions to external forces) or have complicated runtime algorithms and incur non-trivial memory costs. We provide insights into the dimensionality reduction of the pose and coefficient spaces. Our model can be fit quickly as a preprocess, is very compact (~1 MB) and runtime transfer vectors are generated using a simple algorithm in real-time (> 100 Hz using a CPU-only implementation.) We can reproduce lighting effects on hundreds of trained poses using less memory than required to store a single mesh's PRT coefficients. Moreover, our model extrapolates to produce smooth, believable lighting results on novel poses and our method can be easily integrated into existing interactive content pipelines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHuman Motion and AnimationFrench-language works237,207