MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084115897 · doi:10.1021/ie0402721

Mechanism of Lactic Acid Extraction with Quaternary Ammonium Chloride (Aliquat 336)

2005· article· en· W2084115897 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgence Universitaire de la Francophonie
KeywordsAliquat 336ChemistryLactic acidExtraction (chemistry)DodecaneChlorideInorganic chemistryAqueous two-phase systemPhase (matter)MoleculeAqueous solutionAmmoniumChromatographyNuclear chemistryOrganic chemistrySolvent extraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The extraction of lactic acid with Aliquat 336 dissolved in dodecane and decanol was investigated at various experimental conditions . To determine the concentration of extracted anions and undissociated molecules in the organic phase, the experimental results were treated by mass balance equations of lactic acid and hydrogen concentration in both phases. Thus, the ratio between the extracted anions and whole (undissociated) molecules was calculated. This ratio depends strongly on the pH and lactic acid concentration. The overall distribution coefficient rises or decreases with the pH increase in dependence on lactic acid concentration . The obtained linear dependence of the acid molecules concentration in the organic phase on their concentration in the aqueous phase is a strong argument to suppose physical extraction by Aliquat 336.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.856

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it